Feb
23

“Diana of the Tides” A sensation in her time

(Image: Diana of the Tides’ vibrant colors are reminiscent of paintings by Maxfield Parrish.  Diana’s creator, John Elliott, knew Maxfield and his father Stephen from visits to the artists’ colony in Cornish, N.H. Image courtesy of Smithsonian Archives.)

Who would think that behind the east wall of the Natural History Museum’s paleontology hall is a painting of a goddess that created a sensation when it was installed in 1910? Some of you who visited the museum 50 years ago may remember the captivating “Diana of the Tides” as she surveyed the hall.

Diana was painted by American artist John Elliott (whose mother-in-law was Julia Ward Howe, author of “The Battle Hymn of the Republic”) as a gift to the Smithsonian from Washington, D.C.,  residents Mr. and Mrs. Larz Anderson. Diana was painted in Rome between 1906 and 1908, and she was finally unveiled at a special exhibition there in 1909 that was attended by King Victor Emmanuel II. Her charms were not lost on His Majesty; he told Elliott that he found “much in the picture genuinely of interest.”  The Chinese Minister also visited Diana, “to signify his profound Celestial veneration for the Fine Arts.”

Mr. and Mrs. Larz Anderson gave Diana to the Smithsonian in the hope that their gift would inspire others to philanthropy. The Andersons' house in Washington, D.C., is now the headquarters for the Society of the Cincinnati and is open to the public for tours. (Google Images/Public Domain)

Mr. and Mrs. Larz Anderson gave Diana to the Smithsonian in the hope that their gift would inspire others to philanthropy. The Andersons' house in Washington, D.C., is now the headquarters for the Society of the Cincinnati and is open to the public for tours. (Google Images/Public Domain)

The Andersons purchased Diana for the Smithsonian’s new “National Gallery of Art,” housed in what was then called the U.S. National Museum’s grand north hall (now the Sant Ocean Hall of the National Musem of Natural History). Not to be confused with the National Gallery of Art as we know it today, the name “National Gallery of Art” was given to the Andrew Mellon collection that became the National Gallery of Art in 1937 – just to the east of Natural History. The Smithsonian’s collection was renamed the National Collection of Fine Arts and now is the Smithsonian American Art Museum.

Diana was stored in the Smithsonian Castle’s Regents Room for safekeeping while construction of the Natural History Museum building was underway. Richard Rathbun, who oversaw the erection of the building, wrote to the painter’s wife: “I am certain from all that has been said that Mr. Elliott’s painting will become such a feature of the new building that people will journey there for its sake alone.”

The 25-foot-wide by 11-foot-high canvas of Diana was placed in the north hall for the opening of the new gallery on March 17, 1910.  As they are today, Smithsonian staff back then also performed  “other duties as assigned,” and Dr. William Henry Holmes, the Smithsonian’s eminent Curator of Anthropology (who also  happened to be an artist), became Curator of the new gallery. Holmes reported that “Diana received much attention and much praise.”

At the end of the year, Diana was moved to the paleontology hall (a tenuous connection was made with skeletons of sea mammals), where she remains to this day.  Diana was (and still is) part of the SAAM collection.

Diana surveys the paleontology hall in 1930. Hornblower and Marshall, the architects of NMNH, approved her location on the east wall. (Image courtesy of Smithsonian Archives)

Diana surveys the paleontology hall in 1930. Hornblower and Marshall, the architects of NMNH, approved her location on the east wall. (Image courtesy of Smithsonian Archives)

The original exhibit label described Diana standing “erect in her chariot, a rainbow-tinted sea-shell drawn by four white horses. The horses typify the flow of the tides, their action repeating and amplifying the rhythm of the breaking waves. The moon behind the goddess in the east rises through the purple shadows that follow the setting of the sun in the west.” In other words, Diana was ablaze in living Technicolor long before Technicolor was invented. She was unlike anything anyone had ever seen.

Diana was admired by many and by all accounts met with critical acclaim. Charles D. Walcott, the Secretary of the Smithsonian at the time, told the artist’s wife, “I never pass through the hall without stopping to look at it.” Even President Theodore Roosevelt was taken with the goddess. In a letter to Mrs. Elliott he wrote “by the way, tell your husband I like his mural painting in the Natural History Museum in Washington.”

Diana was on view until the early 1960s when she was obscured by a wall.  In 1979,  the hall was undergoing renovation and Diana was rediscovered. Richard Fiske, the director of the museum, thought about uncovering Diana and talked to Joshua Taylor, the director of the National Collection of Fine Arts, about having her once again preside over the hal.   Sadly for Diana, it was not to be, and she remains hidden from view.

Plans are in the works for the hall to undergo another renovation—this time to return it to its original Beaux-Arts architecture,  much like the Behring Hall of Mammals and the Sant Ocean Hall. To paraphrase Rogers and Hammerstein’s song from The Sound of Music, “How do you solve a problem like Diana?” Prior to the design of the new hall, Diana will be uncovered and examined by a conservator to see how she has withstood time, hidden from the world for so long. There is no doubt that she is an important part of the history of the institution…will she be relevant today? We’ll keep you posted!

This  post was originally published by the Natural History Museum’s blog, Natural History@100. It was written by Amy Ballard, Senior Historic Preservation Specialist: Architectural History and Historic Preservation, Smithsonian Office of Facilities, Engineering & Operations.


Posted: 23 February 2011
About the Author:

The Torch relies on contributions from the entire Smithsonian community.

12 Responses to “Diana of the Tides” A sensation in her time
    • Nancy Bechtol
    • I am late to chime in here, but was totally unaware of this wonderful gem in our art collection. What a neat story of celebration, honor, fame, and then loss which Amy has brought to our attention through her beautifully written words. Hopefully Diana will once again raise from the dust and be on display again soon at NMNH.

    • Ann Trowbridge
    • Hope Diana remains in good enough condition to thrill dinosaur hall visitors once again! What would the Smithsonian do without Amy Ballard to reveal its stories?

    • Nik Apostolides
    • Amy – Love your article about Diana of the Tides! At one point I worked in the headquarters building of the U.S. Department of Justice building here in DC, and we had our own bare-breasted artwork. Great story!

    • Barbara Faust
    • What a fascinating piece of Smithsonian history. I’d love to see Diana displayed for all to see!

    • Helena Wright
    • Save Diana! Applaud Amy! What a great piece of Smithsonian history, so well told. Let’s hope someone can find a way to present Diana to her adoring fans once again.

    • Alex di Giovanni
    • Amy, have to say– you are rocking the comments! Hands down, most popular post. Keep the updates coming!

    • Jason Bannister
    • A wonderful story about a piece of the Smithsonian’s great history that should be treasured forever!

    • Ed Rynne
    • One of those fascinating stories from the past that bears retelling for each subsequent generation.

    • Lee Hanley
    • What a fascinating article! About something I never knew about. I am sure there are lots of stories floating around that need to be told. Can we have more stories like this one?

    • Carole Neves
    • As a wellspring of knowledge about the history of the Smithsonian, please keep readers informed about the fate of Diana of the Tides. We also would enjoy additional, well researched pieces on the history of the Smithsonian including people who worked here.

    • Deborah Smith
    • What a wonderful article by Amy Ballard on “Diana!” Keep these coming! Much thanks to the Torch for publishing and Amy for researching and writing.